This week, India and Pakistan celebrate their 75th anniversary of independence.
The celebrations represent an important chapter in the dissolution of the British Empire. The partition of India was a controversial decision that was largely made by British politicians unfamiliar with the country.
Creating separate states for the Muslim and Hindu populations of British India led to the displacement of up to 20 million people, and an estimated 2 million deaths in the violence that followed.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, center, greets artists performing at the 17th-century Mughal-era Red Fort on Independence Day in New Delhi, India, Monday, Aug.15, 2022Pankaj Nangia/AP
India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi marked the occasion with a speech that decried the continued legacy of colonialism under the British Empire.
“Hundreds of years of colonialism has restricted our sentiments, distorted our thoughts,” he said from Red Fort in New Delhi on August 15. “When we see even the smallest thing related to colonialism in us or around us, we have to be rid of it.”
Pakistan celebrated its independence a day earlier on August 14. Politicians laid a floral wreath at the grave of Muhammad Ali Jinnah, leader of the All-India Muslim Leagues and considered the founding father of Pakistan.
Pakistan Navy personnel escort top officials of provincial government arriving to lay wreaths on the mausoleum of Muhammad Ali Jinnah, founder of PakistanFareed Khan/Copyright 2022 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
Reflections in Pakistani theatre
The complicated history of partition is central to the new play Saadhay 14 August, by Anwar Maqsood, which opened in Karachi on Tuesday.
Maqsood’s play is the third in a trilogy that consults the legacy of India and Pakistan’s independence from the British Empire.
The play shows Jinnah and Mahatma Gandhi – the founding fathers of India – visit present-day Lahore and Delhi together to look at the state of affairs in both countries.
Mahatma Gandhi, right, and Muhammad Ali Jinnah, pose at the steps of Jinnah’s home where the two met to discuss the Hindu-Muslim conflict in 1944AP1944
Magsood said he wrote the play because he thinks the objective of freedom has not been achieved yet. “What was the purpose of Pakistan? What was the purpose of the Partition? If there was a purpose, the same is the purpose of this play,” he said.
“We’ve got a country of our own where we can live freely. Did we do justice to this land? This is the question that this play asks,” he added.
At the end of the show, the audience gave a standing ovation to Tanveer Gill, who plays Gandhi.
“Despite whatever happened between us, essentially we (Pakistan and India) are the same people,” said Gill. “There should be no hatred between us. This is the message that Anwar (the writer) has tried to put across.”
A legacy of British colonialism
As India and Pakistan celebrate independence, it is also a ripe opportunity to examine the legacy of the British Empire, suggests Professor Gurminder K Bhambra, a postcolonial and decolonial studies expert at the University of Sussex.
“There is a real problem with the way in which history is taught in Britain,” she says.
The British are quick to forget the historical and continued ties modern-day Britain has with India and Pakistan.
“If we think about the history or the way in which Britain is represented within the media, it’s as if Britain exists as a separate entity. And the extent to which Empire is talked about, it’s as if Britain, the nation, had an empire, which is separate from it,” Bhambra says.
This separation, she suggests, allows for the British to not fully acknowledge the extent to which the legacy of the British Empire continues to shape modern Britain.
Lord Mountbatten, first governor-general of British India with Lady Mountbatten and India’s first prime minister Jawaharlal NehruKELLY/1947 AP
One of the key topics of Britain’s imperial past is the legacy of colonial taxation, an academic focus of Bhambra’s work. Britain didn’t force working and middle class people in the British Isles to pay income tax until 1914.
But Indian subjects of the British Empire had been paying income tax since 1861.
While that income tax was collected for welfare programmes within the British Isles, none was set aside for welfare in the colonies.
“There is a question to be asked, particularly in the context of debates in the present around people who come to the UK and get access to welfare despite their families having never paid in,” Bhambra says. “Well, actually, many colonial subjects are likely to have had families who did pay in to income tax.”
Restricting the distribution of wealth across the current borders of a nation that was previously an empire is an unfair way to view what the modern day peoples of Britain’s colonies deserve, Bhambra argues.
Modern issues, historical causes
Many present day issues, such as racism, are still the result of a misunderstanding of Britain’s colonial past.
While there are discussions around immigration between India and the UK, it is often forgotten that Indians pre-independence held British passports.
“We didn’t come to Britain from the outside. We came to Britain from the inside. And yet, everything about the way in which my schooling, the media, everything that has ever taught me is that I’m an immigrant,” Bhambra says.
“But if I’ve never crossed a political boundary, why am I an immigrant? It’s this sort of failure to understand that the issue is not race – it’s colonialism.”
Traffic congestion on Choeringhee, one of the busiest thoroughfares in Calcutta, India, as the country celebrates its independence from British rule on Aug. 15, 1947ASSOCIATED PRESS/AP1947
As India and Pakistan celebrated the formation of their nation, the beginning of the end for the British Empire also signified the formation of Britain as a nation instead of an imperial force.
For the many European nations that once were empires, there has been little consideration of the reformation of their identities as nation states.
“It’s only by reckoning with its colonial past that it can engage with what is its postcolonial present in it,” Bhambra concludes.