Climate protesters lose legal battle over right to cause damage

climate protesters lose legal battle over right to cause damage

An XR protester outside the studio of GB News, which was sprayed with black paint on Monday morning – Philip Toscano/PA

Eco-activists’ claims that they have a right to cause damage as part of their protests have been rejected by Court of Appeal judges.

Victoria Prentis, the Attorney General, asked the Court to rule on whether eco-protesters could use a defence of “lawful excuse” to cause criminal damage to banks, businesses and private property and avoid conviction at trial.

It follows the acquittal of a protester from a climate action group known as Burning Pink who threw paint at the offices of Greenpeace, Amnesty International, Christian Aid, Friends of the Earth, plus the Conservative, Labour, Lib Dem and Green parties, causing damage that cost more than £36,000 to repair.

The protester was cleared after claiming that she honestly believed that the owners of the damaged property would have consented to it if they had known more about the impact of climate change.

However, on Monday, three Court of Appeal judges ruled that protesters cannot use such a defence, as political beliefs were “too remote” to be classed as a “lawful excuse” if “they had known of the…damage and its circumstances”.

GB News hit by XR protest

GB News was targeted on Monday after Extinction Rebellion (XR) activists hurled fake oil outside the channel’s main studio in London.

Protesters threw the paint outside the entrance of the building in west London, as another masked activist sat on top of a tripod dangling a Pinocchio-like puppet.

Activists branded GB News a “puppet TV station” for the fossil fuel industry. GB News said it would not comment when asked about the demonstration.

climate protesters lose legal battle over right to cause damage

The eco-protesters outside GB News – Philip Toscano/PA

In the Court of Appeal, Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr, Lord Justice William Davis and Mr Justice Garnham ruled that “circumstances” of damage could include the “time, place and extent”, but not the reasons behind a protest.

Giving a summary of the judgement, Baroness Carr said: “The circumstances would not include the political or philosophical beliefs of the person causing the damage.

“They would not include the reasoning or wider motivations for the damage. These matters are too remote from the damage. Evidence from the defendant about the facts of or effects of climate change would be inadmissible.”

Ms Prentis said: “Climate change is an important issue and while the right to protest must be protected, it does not give a right to cause serious criminal damage no matter how strongly held a belief is.

“Today’s judgement is important as it ends any uncertainty over when a person has a lawful excuse to cause damage because they honestly believed the property owner would consent. It clarifies that the importance or merits of a protest are not the ‘circumstances’ of damage caused during that protest.

“It is essential that these cases are dealt with consistently, so we welcome the court’s ruling which will ensure consistency and give judges much needed clarity in this important area of law.”

The judgement will not reverse the acquittal but it will mean that protesters will no longer be able to use “lawful excuse” as a defence.

The argument was used to secure the acquittal of XR protesters who caused £500,000 of criminal damage to HSBC’s London headquarters. The nine women, all members of XR, sang as they shattered windows with hammers and chisels at 7am on April 22, 2021. They were cleared after claiming that they honestly believed that the bank would have consented if it had known more about the impact of climate change.

It follows a similar separate referral to the court over the acquittal of four protesters who toppled the statue of the slave trader Edward Colston in Bristol.

The Court of Appeal ruled that their defence – that convicting them would be a breach of their human right to protest – was not legitimate in cases of “significant” criminal damage. Their acquittal was not reversed.

Play The Telegraph’s brilliant range of Puzzles – and feel brighter every day. Train your brain and boost your mood with PlusWord, the Mini Crossword, the fearsome Killer Sudoku and even the classic Cryptic Crossword.

News Related

OTHER NEWS

FA confident that Man Utd starlet will pick England over Ghana

Kobbie Mainoo made his first start for Man Utd at Everton (Photo: Getty) The Football Association are reportedly confident that Manchester United starlet Kobbie Mainoo will choose to represent England ... Read more »

World Darts Championship draw throws up tricky tests for big names

Michael Smith will begin the defence of his world title on the opening night (Picture: Getty Images) The 2024 World Darts Championship is less than three weeks away and the ... Read more »

Pioneering flight to use repurposed cooking oil to cross Atlantic

For the first time a long haul commercial aircraft is flying across the Atlantic using 100% sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). A long haul commercial flight is flying to the US ... Read more »

King meets world business and finance figures at Buckingham Palace

The King has met business and finance leaders from across the world at a Buckingham Palace reception to mark the conclusion of the UK’s Global Investment Summit. Charles was introduced ... Read more »

What Lou Holtz thinks of Ohio State's loss to Michigan: 'They aren't real happy'

After Ohio State’s 30-24 loss to Michigan Saturday, many college football fans were wondering where Lou Holtz was. In his postgame interview after the Buckeyes beat Notre Dame 17-14 in ... Read more »

Darius Slay wouldn't have minded being penalized on controversial no-call

Darius Slay wouldn’t have minded being penalized on controversial no-call No matter which team you were rooting for on Sunday, we can all agree that the officiating job performed by ... Read more »

Mac Jones discusses Patriots future after latest benching

New England Patriots quarterback Mac Jones (10) Quarterback Mac Jones remains committed to finding success with the New England Patriots even though his future is up in the air following ... Read more »
Top List in the World