Public Bank loses case against house buyer on failure to supply proof of alleged falsification of supporting documents

public bank loses case against house buyer on failure to supply proof of alleged falsification of supporting documents

Public Bank loses case against house buyer on failure to supply proof of alleged falsification of supporting documents

KUALA LUMPUR (May 23): Public Bank Bhd (KL:PBBANK) has lost a case against a house buyer, who sued the bank for terminating a loan facility agreement it had approved earlier after the first disbursement, when the court found that the bank failed to provide documents of purported falsified supporting documents and claims that the customer inflated his income resulting in the facility and house purchase to be terminated.

As a result, the Kuala Lumpur High Court ordered the bank to pay close to RM65,000  in damages to the house buyer, in addition of the court assessing the man’s losses of the value of the property and reputational loss of having been blacklisted by the Central Credit Reference Information System (CCRIS) and CTOS data system.

Judicial Commissioner (JC) Raja Datuk Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah Raja Mohzan also allowed a declaration that the termination of the buyer’s facilities agreement on April 12, 2018, and other relevant agreements were wrongful and had no effect, and that the bank had breached its obligations under the agreement.

Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin also ordered the bank to pay RM30,000 costs in allowing the house buyer’s claim, and dismissed the bank’s counterclaim over the first progressive payment made by the financial institution.

In allowing the total damages of RM64,965.60, the court said out of that sum, RM20,000 was general damages awarded for defamation following the bank’s action.

The JC in his written grounds to the February decision, which was released online this week, said the bank’s failure to support their claims that 37-year-old K Ananthan had provided falsified supporting documents and inflated his income for the purchase of a RM825,000 property in Klang was fatal.

This comes after Ananthan had paid the booking fee of RM1,000 and the bank approved a 90% loan (amounting to RM781,350) and had paid the bank’s processing fee of RM6,813, where he signed the sales and purchase agreement (SPA) on Feb 27, 2018.

House buyer satisfied burden to prove case

Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin ruled that Ananthan had clearly satisfied the burden of proving that first a housing loan agreement existed between him and the bank, and the bank did not release the second, third, and fourth progressive payments.

“So having that in mind, what is the next issue that comes to mind? The answer is simply that it has now become the duty of the bank to negate the findings above and prove that the loan was validly terminated or rescinded, because the supporting document provided by Ananthan to them were indeed forged and inflated.

“As far as I can tell, there is no other way for the bank to deflect this issue than to prove it on the balance of probabilities. I consider it necessary for the bank to first present the relevant forged and inflated documents to the court for my verification of their existence, and only then can I proceed to determine its weight,” the JC said.

Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin said the court was not able to peruse such documents in order to determine its existence, but also the weight they deserved.

“The bank was unfortunate enough not to have filed any such documents to support its defence and counterclaim. In this instance, I find the defendant has failed to prove its right to terminate or rescind the facilities agreement.

“This means Ananthan’s testimony over his position that the facilities agreement and undertaking were breached is intact and unchallengeable. It is obvious that the bank’s case is doomed if it fails to produce such important documents,” he said.

The JC added that the main issue remained that the bank must still prove the existence of forged and inflated documents.

Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin said this is the central issue that cannot be ignored as the bank decided later to terminate the facilities agreement.

He also said that before the court could consider evaluating the so-called bank’s assistance for Ananthan to resubmit the supporting documents, the court must first be satisfied with the events that led to the termination of the housing loan, as it is this issue that must be addressed first before others.

This follows the bank’s claim of a right to modify such a facility at any time, but despite this, the JC said it is important to note that since the bank had offered the grounds for the termination, it is responsible to prove the allegations, especially when a counter claim is filed.

Judge puzzled over bank’s offer to reduce housing loan

The JC said he is also perplexed as to why the bank must still assist Ananthan to obtain a new reduced housing loan of 70% of the purchase price.

“This is a serious allegation of forgery on Ananthan, but the bank seems comfortable proceeding with a reduced amount despite the existence of such an issue. This is another reason why I require the production of the forged and inflated documents,” he said.

In allowing Ananthan’s claim, Raja Ahmad noted a Shah Alam High Court (brought by the developer) had allowed the house buyer a return of RM47,623.13, which is the balance of the deposit of RM82,500, where a sum of RM34,876.87 was forfeited by the developer.

He noted that the bank’s actions had resulted in the cancellation of Ananthan’s SPA as a result of the breach of the facilities agreement.

In allowing Ananthan’s claim of defamation, Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin said this follows the bank’s claim of falsified documents, where the tone of letter from the bank to the developer was not passive and a police report lodged.

“In my opinion, therefore, the tone of the letter was not passive as suggested by the bank. It is unlikely that any reasonable developer would have ignored such a letter, especially if it came from a financier.

“Further supporting my conclusion is the fact the bank failed to prove the existence of the forged and inflated financing income documents in defending the defamation claim,” he said, adding it would be a different scenario if the bank had provided the documents for determination.

In this case, Ananthan was represented by lawyers Jennifer Jayalitha Chandran, Premalatha Arumugam, and Ahmad Hanafi Mohamed Isa, while the bank was represented by Bryan Chen Liang Yi.

The bank has filed a notice of appeal to appeal against Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin’s decision.

OTHER NEWS

3 hrs ago

Heineken Refresh Ignites Musical Revolution At Sunway Lagoon

3 hrs ago

Bersatu man’s Nenggiri seat declared vacant

3 hrs ago

Kim and Putin meet in Pyongyang as rivals worry about North Korea and Russia's military ties

3 hrs ago

Groups, activists to gather as pressure grows for Anwar to axe deal with 'genocide-tainted' BlackRock

3 hrs ago

Najib and Irwan’s IPIC trial postponed again, judge warns against further delay

4 hrs ago

Stay objective over new DLP guidelines, Fadhlina urges

4 hrs ago

Post Malone Announces ‘F-1 Trillion' Album & Release Date

4 hrs ago

Stephen Sanchez's ‘Until I Found You' Success, ‘Angel Face' Deluxe Album & More | Billboard News

4 hrs ago

‘We Were the Lucky Ones' Director on Highlighting a Family Reunion in the Shadow of the Holocaust

4 hrs ago

Faisal needs medical, psychological support for full recovery - Psychologist

4 hrs ago

Procter & Gamble Aims for Streaming Sports Fans With Olympics Competition Series on Peacock

4 hrs ago

Los Angeles Chargers net great offseason grade, but lack of WR is overblown

4 hrs ago

Denver Broncos appear ready to sign player fresh of winning UFL championship

4 hrs ago

Whistleblower says Boeing lost track of bad parts, may have installed them - US Senator

4 hrs ago

Lowering price of eggs could lead to shortage, says Dr Wee

4 hrs ago

5-star EDGE rusher Isaiah Gibson decommits from USC

4 hrs ago

UN Haiti chief warns of 'catastrophic' impact of gang war displacements

4 hrs ago

Joining BRICS will diversify Malaysia's strategic relationships and strengthen its economy

4 hrs ago

Stop dithering and making excuses on DLP, govt told

4 hrs ago

Economist warns of implementation challenges if Malaysia joins BRICS

4 hrs ago

Tight GOP contest between Bob Good and John McGuire highlights primary slate in Virginia

4 hrs ago

Walmart+ Week 2024 Is Here: How to Score Big on Home, Furniture and More

5 hrs ago

MP SPEAKS | DLP guidelines: A step in the right direction

5 hrs ago

Honda agrees two-year MotoGP contract renewal with Joan Mir

5 hrs ago

Starlink has a mini satellite dish that can fit in your backpack

5 hrs ago

Missouri attorney general says not so fast on freeing woman jailed for 43 years in 1980 killing

5 hrs ago

Mortal Kombat 1 Mileena Skin Controversy Explained

5 hrs ago

5 things on Ronaldo making his team ‘Poor-tugal’ at Euro 2024

5 hrs ago

PJ steps up efforts to combat dengue

5 hrs ago

Eddie Murphy on Filming ‘Beverly Hills Cop: Axel F' at 63: "I Would Rather Not Do Any Stunts"

5 hrs ago

José Mourinho heaps praise on German legend Toni Kroos, labels him as one to watch at the EUROs

6 hrs ago

Asia-Pacific markets mostly rise; Taiwan hits fresh record high

6 hrs ago

Court of Appeal verdict shows SLS isn't a ‘busybody’, says lawyer

6 hrs ago

Xbox Game Pass Gets 2 Thrilling Additions Today

6 hrs ago

Jussie Smollett Debuts New Feature, Denzel Washington Hints at Break From Acting at American Black Film Festival

6 hrs ago

Boeing CEO blasted in US Senate hearing while apologizing for safety woes

6 hrs ago

Bursa Malaysia confirms in final talks to move its HQ to TRX

6 hrs ago

States want a bigger cut of taxes

6 hrs ago

Here's how Jayson Tatum and Matthew Tkachuk are connected

6 hrs ago

Mavericks' Mark Cuban no longer has control of basketball operations, and why this is good for Dallas' future