Just days before the vote to finance, six lawmakers, led by Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon, urged the bank’s board of directors to reconsider.
In a move that has sparked controversy and criticism, the Export-Import Bank of the United States has approved financing $500 million for an oil and gas project in Bahrain.
The decision has drawn scrutiny for its perceived inconsistency with President Biden’s commitment to reducing the use of oil and gas, and it even prompted two of the bank’s climate advisors to resign in February, the New York Times reported.
These oil and gas energy sources are often referred to as “dirty energy” because they release pollutants that contribute to the overheating of our planet and health concerns. This is something we want to avoid to protect our communities and the natural world.
When countries funnel money into dirty energy companies, they support industries that are major players in causing climate-related problems. This can lead to all sorts of challenges, from extreme weather events to health issues caused by air pollution.
Just days before the vote to finance, six lawmakers, led by Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon, urged the bank’s board of directors to reconsider, citing the project’s adverse impact on the climate.
In a letter to the bank, the lawmakers emphasized, “We cannot afford to have ExIm undermine domestic and international climate progress,” the Times reported.
Watch now: These futuristic gas stations could completely change what it’s like to own an EV
Despite the outcry, the bank defended its decision emphasizing its mission to promote American exports and job creation. However, critics argue that such financing contradicts the global commitment to transition away from these sources of pollution, a pledge reaffirmed by the United States and nearly 200 other nations, per the Times.
Instead, by investing in clean, renewable energy sources like solar and wind, countries can help lead the charge toward a healthier, more sustainable future. Investments in clean energy are skyrocketing and are now nearly double that of dirty energy investments, signaling a shift toward what’s being dubbed a new “energy superpower.”
There are also notable climate policies aimed at combating pollution rather than exacerbating it. Initiatives such as the Clean Power Plan, the Paris Agreement, and investments in renewable energy infrastructure are vital steps toward mitigating increased pollution and ensuring a sustainable future for generations to come.
You can do your part by educating yourself about climate issues and voting for pro-climate candidates.
Join our free newsletter for cool news and actionable info that makes it easy to help yourself while helping the planet.
Two federal bank advisers resign over approval of financing $500 million for controversial project: ‘We cannot afford [this]’ first appeared on The Cool Down.
News Related-
Russian court extends detention of Wall Street Journal reporter Gershkovich until end of January
-
Russian court extends detention of Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich, arrested on espionage charges
-
Israel's economy recovered from previous wars with Hamas, but this one might go longer, hit harder
-
Stock market today: Asian shares mixed ahead of US consumer confidence and price data
-
EXCLUSIVE: ‘Sister Wives' star Christine Brown says her kids' happy marriages inspired her leave Kody Brown
-
NBA fans roast Clippers for losing to Nuggets without Jokic, Murray, Gordon
-
Panthers-Senators brawl ends in 10-minute penalty for all players on ice
-
CNBC Daily Open: Is record Black Friday sales spike a false dawn?
-
Freed Israeli hostage describes deteriorating conditions while being held by Hamas
-
High stakes and glitz mark the vote in Paris for the 2030 World Expo host
-
Biden’s unworkable nursing rule will harm seniors
-
Jalen Hurts: We did what we needed to do when it mattered the most
-
LeBron James takes NBA all-time minutes lead in career-worst loss
-
Vikings' Kevin O'Connell to evaluate Josh Dobbs, path forward at QB